Copyright © 2009 - 2010 Mark and Susan Archer

All personal posts and comments formulated by Susan Archer, may not in any way, shape, or form, be copied, reproduced, transmitted, or otherwise taken from this blog, without the explicit written and approved request for permission by Susan Archer.

1/11/10

Prosecutors, defense to argue new motion in Scott Roeder trial BY RON SYLVESTER The Wichita Eagle

Prosecutors, defense to argue new motion in Scott Roeder trial


BY RON SYLVESTER

The Wichita Eagle


WICHITA — Prosecutors asked a judge this morning to prohibit Scott Roeder from using voluntary manslaughter in his defense during his first-degree murder trial in the shooting of George Tiller.

But Roeder's public defenders say they're confident the last-minute motion will fail and the judge will allow them to proceed with their case.

Judge Warren Wilbert set a hearing on the state's motion for 1:30 p.m. Tuesday, postponing jury selection in the trial for two days. Jury selection had been scheduled to begin this morning.

On Friday, Wilbert said he could see a situation where testimony would require him to give the jury an option of less severe charges than premeditated murder, including involuntary manslaughter.

"We think the judge correctly stated the law on Friday," said Mark Rudy, one of Roeder's public defenders. "We don't think this issue is ripe at this moment."

Roeder, 51, is charged in the May 31 shooting death of Tiller, one of four doctors in the country who performed late-term abortions when pregnancy threatened the health of the woman. Roeder had claimed he killed Tiller to protect the unborn.

In its motion this morning, the state asked Wilbert to "exclude all references in jury selection, opening statements, direct and cross examination" and rule any proposed evidence about what is known as the "imperfect self-defense" irrelevant to the murder trial.

Kansas law defines voluntary manslaughter as the "unreasonable but honest belief that circumstances existed that justified deadly force" during an intentional killing.

Wilbert said Friday that case law requires him to give options on other charges when the evidence supports it, no matter how weak the evidence might be.

"That's why it's difficult to rule on these types of issues until you hear the evidence," Rudy said. "The law says that if the evidence supports a lesser included charge, the judge has to give it, even if the defendant doesn't ask for it.

"We're confident the judge will say, 'This is the law' and not change what he said on Friday."

Chief Deputy District Attorney Kim Parker wrote in her motion that case law indicates "the attacker must have an actual fear of an imminent attack, regardless of whether the belief is reasonable."

Parker has argued that there was no immediate threat to the unborn because Tiller wasn't shot at his clinic but in the foyer of his church, as he stood at a snack table serving as an usher.

"The Kansas cases that have allowed an imperfect self-defense argument involve situations where the perceived threat was capable of being carried out immediately and was likely to occur within minutes," Parker wrote.

"It has been the uncontroverted law in the state of Kansas since 1883 that no one can attack or kill another because he may fear injury at some point in the future," Parker added.

Parker said to allow Roeder to have the voluntary manslaughter instruction would create anarchy and lawlessness based on political beliefs.

"Taken to its logical extreme, this line of thinking would allow anyone to commit premeditated murder but only be guilty of manslaughter, simply because the victim holds a different set of moral and political beliefs than the attacker," Parker wrote, and "allow an attacker to choose the time and place of the murder, regardless of whether the victim was engaged in threatening conduct at the time of the killing."

Rudy said the defense plans to file a more detailed response later today or Tuesday morning.

Jury selection is now set to begin Wednesday morning.

When jury selection begins, a group of 61 jurors will be called in the first day to face individual questioning by lawyers, which could include their experiences with, or thoughts about, abortion.

They have already faced questions about religious beliefs and opinions on abortions, Wilbert said in a separate order this morning.

"The potential jurors were asked very personal and sensitive questions regarding their religious beliefs, their views on abortion, their knowledge of George Tiller and any pretrial publicity regarding the defendant, Scott Roeder," in a written questionnaire last week, Wilbert said.

Although jury selection is usually held in open court, even when jurors have to talk about sensitive issues such as past sexual abuse, domestic violence or their opinions on the death penalty, Wilbert has closed jury selection.

The Eagle, the Associated Press, KWCH-TV and other news services plan to ask the Kansas Supreme Court to allow public access to the proceedings through reporters covering the trial.

A potential jury pool of 140 filled out pretrial questionnaires last week. The list of questions has also been sealed from public view by Wilbert.

Questioning by lawyers will determine the final panel of 12 jurors and two alternates who will decide the case.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.